Does size matter?
Is performance directly proportional to size?
Some of us are not gifted with the ability to chose our size. Some of us are too small, some of us are too big. I once said that size matters not, but then, I was always well proportioned and didn't have a size problem. And I don't have a penis.
The arguments for each side are varied but clich?.
It doesn't matter what you have, but it's what you do with it that counts. Any more than a mouthful is a waste. Small things come in good packages? Or was it large things comes to those who wait? What? Anyway, yadda, yadda, yadda. I'm 100% sure that every one of you have heard it all before.
But this is totally different.
There's a G5 sitting 2 feet away from me.
Feel the raw power.
It's got a 20-inch flat panel monitor. Looks like the whole wall is taken up by crispy dynamic graphics. Brilliant graphics. Brilliant resolution. Brilliant design. This thing even has a built in USB hub.
Under the gorgeous brushed steel casing its got a 64bit processor, which is double that of any PC that's commercially sold. The 1GHz frontside bus is more than enough bandwidth for the most power hungry application, and yo, I just saw Microsoft Mac-Office install itself in under 60 seconds. I saw that on the 20-inch crystal clear display. The fact that it's also got a 120Gb hard drive and 1024 Mb of RAM seems to fade into the background. All of the other PC's in the office are turning a violent shade of green.
Envious? Of what?
Did I mention 20 inches?
*whimper*
Lets face it.
Size matters.
